US Consul-General
James Keith raised concerns over the interpretation
Washington's
top representatives in Hong Kong have added their voice to the on-going dispute
rising from the recent announcement that the National People's Congress
Standing Committee (NPCSC) will interpret provisions in the Basic Law. US
Consul-General James Keith, speaking after a meeting with Constitutional
Affairs Secretary Stephen Lam, raised concerns that the interpretation would
affect the city's autonomy.
"We
would like to promote ... everything that moves Hong Kong in the direction of
fulfilling our highest expectations for the high degree of autonomy. Therefore
we hope this issue of interpretation will also fit into that context", he
said.
Mr
Keith said that the NPCSC's interpretation would not necessarily create a
constitutional crisis, if the outcome met the demands of the people for a
greater level democracy. "If the Hong Kong government [complies with] the
people's aspirations towards ... democratisation, and if the central government
is prepared to fulfil those aspirations, then as far as I am concerned that is
a matter of political will and there won't be an obstacle in terms of
constitutional law," he said.
He
also added that the impact of the decision on foreign investment was difficult
to gauge, as it depended on the outcome of the interpretation. "It is
crucial to the investment climate in Hong Kong that a high degree of autonomy
be maintained," Keith said, because it affects "the decisions that
individual investors make . . . Everything that moves Hong Kong in the
direction of fulfilling our high expectation for a high degree of autonomy is
to the good."
Also
on 29 March the US consulate issued its first formal statement on the subject
of the planned Basic Law interpretations. A consulate spokeswoman said the
maintenance of autonomy and the rule of law was essential for stability and
prosperity in the city. "The US supports greater democratisation in Hong
Kong through electoral reform and universal suffrage," she said, adding
that it is crucial that the SAR government moves towards the ideal of an
administration that fully represents public interests. "We believe that an
open society with the highest possible degree of autonomy and governed by the
rule of law is essential to maintaining stability and prosperity in Hong
Kong." "Events of the past year", including the July 1 protest,
"amply demonstrated the desire of the people of Hong Kong to advance the
democratisation process."
Meanwhile,
the Foreign Ministry in Beijing has repeatedly warned against foreign
interference in Hong Kong's democratic development, saying that discussions
over Hong Kong's political development are the internal affair of China. This
statement from the US Consulate is timely and important. If, as predicted,
Beijing uses these interpretations to draw Hong Kong's political reform more
firmly under its control, Beijing will have to face the reaction of the United
States.
Meanwhile,
Financial Secretary Henry Tang Ying-yen refuted Keith's worries about
investment. He said he supported the interpretation, saying it would bring
stability to Hong Kong. Speaking at a seminar in Shenzhen, Tang said the move
would not impact greatly on foreign investment, as investors were concerned
mostly with investment returns. Moreover, he argued that the interpretation
would help to reduce differences in society generated by the present debate.
"I think it may help [the economy] because, right now, there is a huge
divergence of views in the community on political reform. This may trigger
fears among investors. What is most important at this juncture in Hong Kong's
ongoing evolution is for the Hong Kong government to consult fully with the
people on measures to implement the Basic Law and move towards a government that
more fully represents the interests of the people," he said.